The past few weeks I've been speeding through this book! I've reached a lot of the shorter stories, some of which are one or two pages long. One of which was incredibly fascinating, it's called "Old Man at the Bridge" and it describes a conversation between a narrator and on old man. As the story progresses Hemingway adds subtle details to the picture, but he doesn't actually tell a story. This begs the question: what makes a story? In this case, there isn't a solid story that is told but rather bits and pieces that could potentially make a story. In a way Hemingway relies on the reader to form the story themselves. You're given information, and what you do with that information creates the story for you as a reader.
Another story that I absolutely fell in love with was "The Snows of Kilimanjaro". It's beautifully written and flips between past and present in the form of flashbacks. Hemingway flips between the two without warning, which follows the stream of consciousness of a dying man. Personally, I love that kind of writing because it's so human. It's abstract, but it's a relatable human experience that doesn't need a lot of explanation. For example Hemingway jumps between one simply with: "Now in his mind he saw a railway station at Karagatch and he was standing with his pack and that was the headlight of the Simplon-Orient cutting the dark now and he was leaving Thrace then after the retreat." There's not a lot of explanation, but Hemingway forces you to go along this journey with him. I'd like to learn how to write like that because it forces the reader to suspend their belief and allow the writer to guide them along this journey they've created.
Additionally, I think that the way Hemingway describes death in the story is so abstract and yet so clear. Throughout the story the main character seems to feel waves of death wash over him, and has moments of certainty that he is going to die. It's a terrifying concept, but he's totally calm about it. He accepts death and remembers the things he'd always wanted to do. However, it isn't until the end that Hemingway shows the scary side of death, when the main character fights and doesn't want to die. He describes death creeping up on his bed, smelling of rot and paralyzing him with fear, but that too passes.
Hemingway ends the story with his wife finding him dead, after he has this beautiful vision of journeying across the countryside. I found one of the most interesting parts of the story was the fact that his wife was trying to take care of him, but denying that he's going to die. He has this internal struggle with death, fighting off these horrible visions and immersing himself in his memories. However, his wife totally denies his struggle until she finds him dead. The reader never really learns how she reacts to this because it ends so abruptly, but it certainly says a lot about perspective in writing and in real life.
As a whole, I think I've found my favorite story in this book! I hope I find more gems like this as I continue reading.
That sounds like a really great book for you, and it seems like you’re thoroughly enjoying it. Is Hemingway the author you chose for your author study? I’m just wondering because I’m reading a book for my author study, and it seems like this might be a very good person for you to choose.
ReplyDeleteEither way, this collection of short stories sounds very unique from the way you describe them. From what you wrote, I know that some of the stories are very short (only 1-2 pages). Are most like this? Are there longer ones? How long do they get? Some short stories hardly qualify as short, although it doesn’t seem like this is the case for Hemingway.
From what I gather, it sounds like Hemingway’s style is very abstract. He let’s the reader build the story themselves, he switches tenses a lot, does stream of consciousness writing, and more that aren’t so common or typical in writing. Does this ever make his writing confusing? Are there any downsides to his alternative approach? It sounds like you like it, but I could see it being potentially a hindrance upon full understanding. Like, maybe he wrote something very unusual, and it makes sense to him, but it’s really so complicated that no one else can fully understand what he’s going for. That happens to me sometimes. Then again, Hemingway is Hemingway and has practiced this craft for a bit longer than I have. I guess I’m just curious.
I’m also kind of wondering what his style/genre/tone is. Is his writing really dark? Realistic? Fantastical? Humorous? I feel like it’s probably a combination of things, or the different stories are differently categorized from one another.
Hope you continue to enjoy the rest as much as you’ve enjoyed this part. Happy reading!